Run an AI visibility audit in 6 steps: choose prompts, test the assistants, score mentions and sources, audit technique, content and third parties, then act.

In short
An AI visibility audit measures how often and how well your brand appears in the answers of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google's AI Overviews. Pick 20 to 50 questions your customers ask, run them in each assistant, and record mentions, position, description, sources cited and competitors. Then audit the three causes of the result: technical access for AI crawlers, the citability of your content and your presence on the third-party sources the AI read. The output is a scored grid and a prioritized action plan.
Want to go further? Ask
An AI visibility audit, also called an AEO audit (answer engine optimization), is the starting point of any GEO work. Without it you optimize blindly; with it you know on which questions you are absent, who is cited instead and why. The method below works by hand, and every step can later be automated.
The audit is only as good as its list of questions. Build it from real demand:
Keep 20 to 50 prompts, tag each with an intent (discovery, comparison, recommendation, brand) and a priority. Add five brand prompts ("what is [brand]", "is [brand] reliable", "[brand] pricing") to check how the AI describe you.
Test at least ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, plus Google with AI Overviews or AI Mode where available. Use a session without personal history, note the date, and run each prompt two or three times: answers vary, and one run is not enough to conclude.
For each answer, record:
Turn the notes into a few indicators you can follow over time:
Break them down by assistant and by intent. A brand often does well on brand prompts and is absent on recommendation prompts, which are the ones that bring new customers.
If AI crawlers cannot read your pages, nothing else matters. Check:
A free GEO audit checks most of these points on a URL in a minute.
For each priority prompt, find the page of your site that should answer it, then check whether it can be cited:
The free AEO audit tool scores a page on these citability criteria.
List the URLs cited in step 2 that do not belong to you. They show where the AI get their information on your market: comparison articles, review platforms, Reddit threads, directories, media, Wikipedia. For each, note whether your brand appears, how it is described and whether the information is current. This citation source audit often explains why a competitor is recommended and you are not.
A spreadsheet with one row per prompt and assistant, accounts on the main assistants, access to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools, your server logs and a few hours. Record screenshots or copies of each answer with the date: they serve as the baseline for the next audit and settle any doubt when results change. Assign one person to the full audit so that scoring stays consistent.
| Area | What to check | Score 0 to 2 | Typical fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mentions | Brand named on priority prompts | 0 absent, 1 sometimes, 2 often | Pages and mentions on missing prompts |
| Position | Rank in lists of recommendations | 0 not listed, 1 lower, 2 top three | Comparison content, reviews |
| Accuracy | Description, prices, offer | 0 wrong, 1 partial, 2 correct | Fix facts on site and profiles |
| Citations | Your URLs among the sources | 0 never, 1 rarely, 2 often | Answer-first, sourced passages |
| Crawler access | robots.txt, firewall, logs | 0 blocked, 1 partial, 2 open | Allow AI search agents |
| Rendering | Main text in the HTML | 0 JavaScript only, 2 HTML | Server-side rendering |
| Content | Pages exist and are citable | 0 missing, 1 weak, 2 strong | Create or restructure pages |
| Third parties | Presence on cited sources | 0 absent, 1 partial, 2 present | Reviews, comparisons, communities |
Sort the gaps by impact and effort. Technical blockers come first, since they cancel everything else and are often quick to fix. Then create the missing pages for high-priority recommendation and comparison prompts. Then correct inaccurate facts on your site and profiles. Finally, plan the longer work on third-party sources. Re-run the same prompts one to three months later to measure progress, and keep the list stable so that results stay comparable. Our guide to building a GEO strategy turns these actions into a full plan.
An AI visibility audit shows on which questions your brand is missing from AI answers, who is cited instead and which technical, content or reputation gap explains it. To repeat the audit automatically, a tool like Sorank's AI visibility tracker asks your prompts in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini (plus Perplexity and Grok from the Pro plan) and keeps the history, with a 3-day free trial.
A full audit once or twice a year is enough for most brands, with lighter tracking of the same prompts every month. Assistants change their models and sources regularly, so monthly measurement shows trends that a single audit cannot.
An SEO audit checks how well a site can rank in search results: crawling, indexing, content, links, speed. An AI visibility audit starts from the answers of AI assistants and measures mentions, citations and accuracy, then looks for causes, which include SEO issues but also third-party sources and content structure.
Models build their picture of a brand from the pages they learned from and the pages they read live. Outdated pages, inconsistent profiles or old articles about your company can all feed wrong facts. Fixing the facts on your own site and on the main third-party profiles is the first remedy.
THEY TRIED SORANK BEFORE YOU
