LLM seeding means publishing your brand on the sources AI assistants read and cite. Where to seed, what to publish and how to measure the result.

LLM seeding exists because AI answers are assembled from sources, and most of those sources are not your own website. When someone asks an assistant for the best tool, agency or product in a category, the answer leans on listicles, reviews, community threads and reference pages. Research on generative engines from Princeton (the GEO study) measured that content citing sources and statistics gains visibility in generated answers; seeding applies the same logic one level up, to where your brand appears.
It is the deliberate distribution of brand information onto the pages large language models retrieve or were trained on. The goal is not traffic from those pages, it is the sentence the AI writes about you afterwards.
Two mechanisms are at work:
Seeding works on both, but retrieval is where you see results first, because it reads the web as it is today.
Because assistants recommend brands by name, and they borrow that recommendation from third parties. A classic search result shows ten links and lets the user decide. An AI answer often names three to five options and explains why. If you are absent from the sources it reads, you are absent from the shortlist, even when your own site ranks well.
This is also why the AI brand mentions you earn off-site carry so much weight: they are the raw material the assistant paraphrases.
On the sources the assistants in your market already cite, not on random sites. Start by asking your target questions in several assistants and noting which domains appear in the citations. The usual categories are:
| Source type | Examples | What to publish |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison and "best of" articles | Industry blogs, media roundups | Accurate product facts, a request to be included or updated |
| Community discussions | Reddit, Quora, specialised forums | Genuine answers from your team, with disclosure |
| Review platforms | G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Google reviews | A complete profile and a steady flow of real reviews |
| Reference pages | Wikipedia, Wikidata, industry directories | Verifiable facts only, following each site's rules |
| Video | YouTube tutorials and reviews | Demos and explainers with clear titles and transcripts |
| Press and data | Trade media, news sites | Original data or studies journalists can quote |
Community platforms deserve special attention: our study of Reddit citations in AI answers shows how often discussion threads feed the response.
A useful mention states clearly what you are, who you are for and what makes you different, in words the AI can reuse. A logo in a sponsor list does almost nothing. A sentence such as "X is a project management tool for construction firms, with offline mobile access" can be lifted straight into an answer.
Anything that would be spam for a human reader is spam for an AI. Fake reviews, undisclosed self-promotion on forums and mass-produced guest posts damage trust on the platforms themselves, and moderators remove them. Reddit and most review sites have explicit rules against undisclosed promotion. Seeding is a reputation job: the mention has to be true and helpful in the place where it appears.
With a fixed panel of prompts asked to several assistants at regular intervals. Pick the 25 to 100 questions your buyers really ask, run them weekly, and record whether you are mentioned, in which position, next to which competitors and with which cited sources. Over a few weeks you see which seeded sources start appearing in citations, and which competitors are named where you are missing, which is what a citation gap analysis formalises.
Doing this by hand quickly becomes impractical. Sorank's AI mention tracking sends your prompts to ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini (plus Perplexity and Grok from the Pro plan) every week and shows which brands are cited in your place, so you know where seeding is needed.
They reinforce each other. Your own pages still need to be crawlable, well structured and authoritative, because assistants also cite brand websites, and Google's AI features draw on pages that rank. Off-site mentions add the independent confirmation that a model looks for before recommending you. Backlinks from relevant sites help both: they carry authority for Google and they are, very often, mentions on pages AI assistants read. Sorank's backlink network places one-way contextual links from relevant, non-competing sites for that reason.
LLM seeding means making sure the sources AI assistants trust describe your brand clearly, consistently and truthfully. Identify the domains cited for your target questions, earn a genuine presence on them, and measure the effect with a stable prompt panel. To track where you appear in AI answers and publish the content that supports it on autopilot, start Sorank with a 3-day free trial.
No. Link building aims at hyperlinks that pass authority to your pages in Google. LLM seeding aims at mentions and descriptions of your brand on the pages AI assistants retrieve, whether or not those pages link to you. The two overlap on good third-party articles, which often deliver both.
For assistants that search the web in real time, a new mention on a page they already retrieve can appear in answers within days or weeks. For what a model knows without searching, you have to wait for its next training cut, which usually takes months. Track a fixed set of prompts weekly to see the difference.
Yes. The highest-leverage actions are mostly time, not money: answering real questions on Reddit and Quora with disclosure, keeping review profiles complete, pitching your data to journalists and asking to be added to existing comparison articles. Paid placements help only when the publication is one AI assistants already cite.
THEY TRIED SORANK BEFORE YOU
