The Skyscraper Technique in 2026: Method, Limits and the Variant That Still Earns Links

Quick quiz

How should you get links from other websites?

Question 1 of 425%

Does your site already have useful content?

Very littleSome good pagesLots of articles and guides

The skyscraper technique was named by Brian Dean, who described it on Backlinko: he improved a popular list, emailed 160 site owners and earned 17 links, an 11% success rate, while organic traffic to his site doubled in 14 days. The method became one of the most copied ideas in link building, and that popularity is now its main weakness. This guide covers the original method step by step, the reasons it fails today, the variant that still works, and how the same logic helps a page get cited by ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.

What is the skyscraper technique?

The idea comes from architecture: the tallest building in a city gets the attention. In SEO, the "tallest" page on a topic is the one that sites cite as the reference, so the plan is to build a taller one and tell the people who cited the old one.

Brian Dean's original process has three steps:

1. Find link-worthy content: a page in your niche with many referring domains.
2. Make something even better: beat it on length, freshness, design and depth.
3. Reach out to the right people: email the sites that already link to the original.

The logic is sound: a site that linked to a resource once has shown it links to that kind of content, so it is a warm prospect, far better than a random list of blogs. What has changed is what "better" must mean and how many other people are sending the same email.

How does the skyscraper technique work, step by step?

Here is the method as it should be run today, with two steps the original version skipped: understanding why the page was linked, and following up.

1. Find pages with many referring domains

Pick a topic close to your offer, then list the pages that rank for it and the pages with the most backlinks. Ahrefs suggests treating pages with more than 50 referring domains as good targets. A free backlink analysis shows how many sites link to a URL and who they are. Look beyond the single best page: the backlinks of the top 5 to 10 results give you a much larger prospect list.

2. Understand why each site linked

This is the step most campaigns skip. Read 20 to 30 of the linking pages and note the reason for the link: a statistic they quoted, a definition, a tool they recommend, a list they used as a source. Group prospects by reason. A blogger who quoted one number needs a fresher number; a resource page needs a better resource. The anchor text of each link is a fast clue to that reason.

3. Build a page that adds something new

Google's guidance on helpful content asks whether a page provides "original information, reporting, research, or analysis" and "substantial value when compared to other pages in search results". That is the bar. Length alone does not clear it; information gain does: new data, a calculator, real screenshots from tests, an updated figure where the original is outdated, a clearer table. A content brief generator helps list what the top pages cover, so you can see what is missing.

4. Send personal, segmented outreach

Write one short email per segment, built around the reason that site linked. Point to the exact sentence on their page, say what is outdated or missing, and give the one element of your page that fixes it. Our guide to email outreach covers finding the right contact and writing subject lines.

5. Follow up once, then measure

Send one polite follow-up after five to seven days. Track for each segment: emails sent, replies, links earned and the quality of the linking site. If a segment gets replies but no links, the pitch is fine and the page is not convincing enough; if it gets no replies, the pitch or the targeting is wrong.

Does the skyscraper technique still work in 2026?

It works far less well in its original form. Ahrefs (February 2023) cites Aira's State of Link Building report: only 18% of SEOs still use it, which ranks it 20th among link building tactics. In a poll by Ahrefs of 1,242 people, 61% still said it works. Both figures say the same thing: it can work, but most practitioners have moved on.

Five reasons explain the drop:

• Saturation: site owners with a popular resource receive the same "I wrote something better" email several times a month.
• Low reply rates: a study of 12 million outreach emails by Backlinko and Pitchbox (2019) found that only 8.5% received a response. At the original 11% success rate, 50 links already took about 450 emails.
• Length arms race: "101 tips" answering "75 tips" adds words, not value, and readers and editors see it.
• Brand effect: people link to sources they trust; a better page from an unknown site is often ignored.
• Link spam rules: when an outreach campaign turns into paying for the link, it breaks Google's spam policies, which define link spam as "creating links to or from a site primarily for the purpose of manipulating search rankings".

The same study shows what still moves the numbers: one follow-up raised replies by 65.8%, a personalized email body by 32.7%, and contacting several people at the same organization by 93%.

Original method or 2026 version: what changes?

Which variant still earns links?

The variant that works best is a data-led skyscraper: instead of rewriting the reference page, you produce the one fact everybody quotes, updated. Four forms are worth testing:

• Updated statistic: many popular pages cite a figure that is three to five years old. Re-run the survey or the count, publish the method, and pitch the sites quoting the old number.
• Free tool: a calculator or checker replaces a static list and keeps earning links for years.
• Broken or outdated source: when the original page has moved, died or not been updated, the sites linking to it have a real reason to change the link (the broken link method).
• Your own refresh: if you already own a page with links, update it with new figures before a competitor does. A regular content refresh protects the links you have.

Combine the skyscraper with other methods rather than relying on it alone: digital PR for data stories, unlinked brand mentions for quick wins, and the full comparison in our guide to backlink strategies.

How does the skyscraper technique help with AI visibility?

ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity build their answers from pages they can quote: a clear definition, a dated number, a comparison table. A skyscraper page built on information gain is exactly that kind of source. When a page holds the most recent figure on a topic, it can win both the backlinks and the citations in AI answers, which our study of AI citations by platform tracks across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude.

The research step changes too. Besides the pages with the most backlinks, look at the pages AI assistants already cite in your niche: those are the references you need to beat. Sorank's competitor spy shows which competitors are cited by AI on your topics, and AI mention tracking follows whether your brand appears once your new page is live.

Sorank is our product: an SEO and GEO software in autopilot. Its article generator writes and publishes sourced articles for Google and AI every month, and backlink acquisition obtains natural backlinks automatically from the sites of its 5,000+ users, which covers the steady link base while you reserve skyscraper campaigns for your best assets.

Is the skyscraper technique worth your time?

Use it for one or two strong assets per quarter, not as your only link source. Pick a topic where the reference page is outdated, bring something it lacks, segment your prospects and write to each group about the exact sentence your page improves. Information gain earns the link; length does not. To keep a steady flow of optimized articles and links running in the background, see Sorank's plans, with a 3-day free trial.