Preferences

Privacy is important to us, so you have the option of disabling certain types of storage that may not be necessary for the basic functioning of the website. Blocking categories may impact your experience on the website. More information

Accept all cookies

Food and Beverage AI Citation Study: 4050 AI Answers Measured

Data study of 4050 AI answers in Food and Beverage: which platforms the AIs cite in this sector, how it differs from the general ranking, and what to do about it.

Published on:
30/8/2026
-
Updated on:
30/8/2026
Bar chart of the platforms most cited by the AIs in Food and Beverage, measured by Sorank on 301025 AI answers
Bar chart of the platforms most cited by the AIs in Food and Beverage, measured by Sorank on 301025 AI answers
Thibault Besson-Magdelain fondateur de Sorank

About Author

Thibault Besson-Magdelain

Founder of Sorank, 5+ years of experience in SEO, GEO enthusiast.

The short answer

In Food and Beverage, 4050 AI answers were measured between May 2026 and August 2026. The most cited platform is TripAdvisor at 14.27%, ahead of Facebook at 2.35%. That ranking differs from the general one: TripAdvisor is cited 13.2 times more here than in the general ranking.

Food and beverage is the most concentrated sector in the entire dataset: one review platform takes more citations than the next five sources combined.

Key figures

  • 301025 AI answers analysed between August 2025 and August 2026
  • 1820738 citations extracted from those answers
  • 131349 distinct domains cited at least once
  • 5 models measured separately: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Grok
  • 79% of the questions asked in French, the rest in English

Which platforms the AIs cite in Food and Beverage

  • TripAdvisor: 14.27%
  • Facebook: 2.35%
  • Instagram: 2.2%
  • Trustpilot: 2.2%
  • Reddit: 1.83%
  • Wikipedia: 1.16%
  • YouTube: 0.32%
  • TikTok: 0.3%
  • Yelp: 0.3%
  • LinkedIn: 0.25%

What this sector cites more than the average

  • TripAdvisor: 14.27% here against 1.08% in the general ranking, 13.2 times more
  • Instagram: 2.2% here against 0.42% in the general ranking, 5.2 times more
  • Yelp: 0.3% here against 0.08% in the general ranking, 3.8 times more
  • TikTok: 0.3% here against 0.09% in the general ranking, 3.3 times more
  • Facebook: 2.35% here against 0.85% in the general ranking, 2.8 times more

The leading source model by model

  • ChatGPT: TripAdvisor at 14.82%
  • Gemini: TripAdvisor at 4.37%
  • Perplexity: TripAdvisor at 23.63%

How to read these numbers

A citation rate of 2% means the source was cited twice for every 100 measured answers. Rates are computed per model against the number of answers of that model, so a model with a smaller sample never distorts a column. A source cited several times inside one answer is counted once per company block, which keeps a single verbose answer from dominating a month.

The distribution is worth as much as the ranking. The top three sources hold 75% of the citations counted in this table, 6 platforms sit above 1%, and TripAdvisor is cited 6.1 times more often than Facebook. A market where three sources hold most of the citations rewards depth on those three rather than presence everywhere.

This sector was measured on 4050 answers, 91.6% of them in French, across 3 of the five models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity). The language mix matters when you read the ranking, because local platforms weigh more in French speaking markets.

What changed over the measured period

This sector was measured over 4 months, between May 2026 and August 2026, on 4050 answers, and 17 platforms recorded at least one citation. Its leading source, TripAdvisor, rose from 3.33% in May 2026 to 15.76% in August 2026, which is the kind of movement that makes a ranking older than one quarter unreliable.

TripAdvisor month by month in this sector

  • May 2026: 3.33%
  • June 2026: 9.67%
  • July 2026: 18.98%
  • August 2026: 15.76%

What this means in practice

For restaurants and food businesses, this removes any ambiguity about where to spend the first hour of work. The review profile is the source, the social pages come second, and the website is a distant third. That does not make the site useless, it makes it the place for the information the profile cannot hold, such as the full menu, allergen details and the story of the house. Both are read, but only one is quoted first.

How to use this study

  1. Keep the review profile complete and recent, including photos and current hours.
  2. Publish the full menu as text on your own site rather than as a picture or a PDF.
  3. Maintain the social pages that carry your location and opening hours.

How this study was measured

  1. We run a panel of buyer questions every month, the questions people type before choosing a supplier.
  2. Every question is sent to five AI: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Grok.
  3. Every answer is parsed, every cited source is extracted and normalised to a domain and a platform.
  4. The citation rate is the number of citations of a source per 100 measured answers, computed per model so an uneven number of answers per model never distorts a column.
  5. The month is closed, the dataset is rebuilt, and the public files are republished on data.sorank.com.

Limits of this study

  1. This panel is not a neutral sample of the web. The questions come from the sectors our users operate in.
  2. The panel leans French: 237930 answers come from questions asked in French and 63095 from questions asked in English.
  3. Model coverage is uneven: 87008 answers from ChatGPT, 87004 from Perplexity, 87000 from Gemini, 20011 from Claude and 20002 from Grok. The two smallest samples are read as direction rather than as precise values.
  4. A citation is not a click. This study measures what the AIs cite, not what a reader does next.

The dataset behind this study

Every number on this page comes from the public Sorank dataset. The underlying figures, the monthly detail and the filters are available here:

Open the source data on data.sorank.com

Data updated on 2026-08-26.

How to cite this study

This study is free to quote, in an article, a deck or a report. Please cite the source and the measurement period, because the numbers move every month.

Sorank (2026). Food and Beverage AI Citation Study: 4050 AI Answers Measured. Sorank GEO studies, measured on 301025 AI answers collected between August 2025 and August 2026. Available at https://www.sorank.com/data/food-beverage-ai-citation-study

Related studies

The same panel, read from another angle:

Measure your own citations

This study describes a market. Sorank measures your site: which questions mention you, which mention someone else, and what to publish to change that, tracked weekly across the same five AI.

Start with 3 days free. A payment card is required to open the trial.

Frequently questions asked

Which platform do the AIs cite most in Food and Beverage?

TripAdvisor at 14.27%, ahead of Facebook at 2.35% and Instagram at 2.2%. The full ranking is on this page, and the source data is public on data.sorank.com.

How was this study measured?

On 301025 answers from five AI, collected between August 2025 and August 2026, with every cited source extracted and normalised. The citation rate is the number of citations per 100 measured answers. The public dataset is on data.sorank.com.

Is a PDF menu a problem?

Yes, in practice. A menu published as an image or a PDF is much harder to quote than the same menu written as text, and the models answer dietary and price questions from text.

Our Blog for Ambitious Company