Large Language Models do not read pages the way humans do. They scan for structured, clearly chunked information they can confidently extract and cite. If your content is buried in long paragraphs, relies on JavaScript rendering, or lacks explicit headings, AI assistants like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini will simply skip it in favour of a better-formatted competitor. The tool above analyses a page you provide and returns a readability score along with the specific factors holding it back.
What the tool checks
The tool above evaluates several dimensions that determine whether an LLM can extract useful answers from your page:
- Content chunking: Are ideas broken into short, self-contained paragraphs? LLMs work best with units of 40 to 80 words that carry a single clear claim.
- Heading structure: A logical hierarchy of H1, H2, and H3 headings acts as a table of contents for AI crawlers, signalling what each section answers.
- Answer-ready statements: Pages that open sections with a direct answer before adding nuance are far more likely to be cited verbatim.
- Lexical clarity: Jargon-heavy text without definitions reduces the confidence an LLM places in the page as a reliable source.
- Accessible formatting: Tables, ordered lists, and definition-style sentences are parsed reliably. Dense prose or text embedded in images is not.
How to interpret and act on the results
A high score does not guarantee AI citations, but a low score almost certainly prevents them. Here is how to act on the report the tool above produces:
- Below 50: Structural rewrite needed. Prioritise breaking the page into sections with explicit H2 headings and converting long prose into short paragraphs or bullet lists.
- 50 to 74: Targeted improvements. Add a direct answer sentence at the top of each section, replace vague introductions, and verify that key claims are stated as plain text rather than rendered in JavaScript.
- 75 and above: Fine-tuning. Review lexical clarity, add FAQ schema to reinforce answer-ready passages, and check that internal links use descriptive anchor text.
A benchmark to keep in mind
According to Ahrefs data covering 300,000 keywords, pages at position 1 can lose up to 58% of their expected clicks when a Google AI Overview is displayed. That traffic does not disappear: it shifts to the sources cited inside the AI answer. Improving LLM readability is one of the most direct levers to capture that citation slot and recover the lost visibility.
For ongoing tracking of your AI citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, Sorank monitors your brand mentions in AI answers automatically.

























